> On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:59 AM, Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote:
>
> To be clear I can only think of one leak that we have at process exit
> (well technically its two instances of the same thing). And that leak is
> not the result of a *mistake*. It is a deliberate design decision to
> workaround around a problem on some platforms (i.e. anything that isn't
> Windows, Linux or Solaris, IIRC).
There's at least one more, we don't call X509_PURPOSE_cleanup(), without
which we leak memory allocated via X509_PURPOSE_add(). There may be other
static allocations that the test suite does not exercise.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Marty G
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Marty G
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Marty G
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Jordan Brown
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Jakob Bohm
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Matt Caswell
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Michael Wojcik
- Re: [openssl-users] Initialising OpenSSL more... Jordan Brown
