OpenSSL 1.1.x handle the locking themselves. You don't need to install the locking call backs and don't need to provide locking functionality.
Pauli -- Oracle Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption Phone +61 7 3031 7217 Oracle Australia From: Charles Mills [mailto:charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2017 6:09 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: [openssl-users] Replacing CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS on migration 101 to 110 I am migrating a multi-threaded Windows application from OpenSSL 1.0.1h to 1.1.0f. I am using the Shining Light pre-built Windows DLLs. The code, which I wrote some time ago, has a statement HANDLE Comm::sslMutexArray[CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS]; The array is referenced by my sslLockingFunction. When I compile with the 1.1.0f headers I get at undefined symbol on CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS. Is my understanding of http://www.manpagez.com/man/3/CRYPTO_num_locks/osx-10.3.php correct? Basically, I need to replace the static array sslMutexArray[CRYPTO_NUM_LOCKS] with a malloc() or new to get an array of the size returned by a call to CRYPTO_num_locks(void)? Is that correct? Anything else I need to do in this regard? Thanks, Charles
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
