Hi, Thanks for the pointers. We will consider that option. Regards, Sanjaya
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Michael Tuexen < michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > On 1 Mar 2017, at 06:34, Sanjaya Joshi <joshi.sanj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Thank you Salz Rich for the confirmation. > > So, whether application can perform manual TLS handshakes when > SOCK_SEQPACKET is used ? > I this the SOCK_SEQPACKET model doesn't fit well to the way the openssl > code is layed out. > They basically want a one-to-one relation between a bio (for example a > socket bio) and > a TLS connection. So there is no muxing/demuxing ongoing. > > I'm wondering why you are sticking to the 1-to-many style sockets and why > you are not > considering DTLS over SCTP instead of TLS over SCTP. DTLS over SCTP using > one-to-one > style sockets (SOCK_STREAM) is supported by OpenSSL on Linux and FreeBSD. > > Best regards > Michael > > > > Regards, > > Sanjaya > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > > > But these calls don't work when SOCK_SEQPACKET (one-to-many > connections) is used. Does openssl provide any alternatives for these calls > ? Or an application need to perform the TLS handshakes manually ? > > > > This is not supported, and there are no demo's available. > > -- > > openssl-users mailing list > > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users > > > > -- > > openssl-users mailing list > > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
