> In both cases I would like to remove these engines from 1.1.0. I'd like to > hear > from the community if there is any active use of these. One option if there is > found to be some small scale use is to spin out the engine into a separately > managed repo (as has happened recently with the GOST engine).
Please do. I know Sander was interested in updating CHIL but never found time. That also removes the last remaining need for "dynamic locks" huzzah -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
