On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:24:17AM -0800, Jay Foster wrote:
> I can understand the desire to remove the assembly code options,
*ONLY* for deprecated legacy algorithms, as an alternative to the
proposal to remove the algorithm entirely.
> I recently updated a product I support (50MHz single core) to OpenSSL
> 1.0.2d, and found that the assembly optimizations gave me a 40% increase in
> performance over the C version (AES decryption). 40% was very significant
> in my case. Seems like the low power IoT devices might be similarly CPU
> challenged in the future.
The AES assembly packs are staying either way. Enjoy.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
