On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Mike Mohr <akih...@gmail.com> wrote: > The task of implementing AES should not be undertaken by a novice > programmer. Please save the world another heartbleed and pick something > more in line with your skill level. Maybe I am not parsing it correctly.... It sounds like he wants to use something like AES/CTR from an existing library like OpenSSL; and not implement AES from the ground up.
Also, OpenSSL is susceptible to side channel attacks due to its table driven implementation. So its not clear to me how he could do much worse since a break is a break. You are either pregnant or you are not. There's no degree's of pregnancy, like being half pregnant. (There's some hand waiving above since it depends on the threat model. But you usually don't exclude threats because they are inconvenient or don't meet your efficiency goals. That's similar to what Browsers do in their threat models - they exclude inconvenient stuff or stuff that conflicts with their usability goals. That's one of the reasons browser security is such a joke). Jeff _______________________________________________ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
