On 24 October 2014 10:03, Richard Moore <richmoor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 October 2014 09:16, Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote: >> >> I agree. This topic came up briefly at our recent OpenSSL team meeting >> in Dusseldorf. I think there was a strong consensus within the team to >> create a new name (probably with SSLv23_method #defined to point to >> the new name). The name TLS_method has been proposed. This would be > > > Doing this using a #define would break binary compatibility. Wouldn't it be > better to just have SSLv23_method remain a function that just calls the new > one?
Hi Rich We only aim for binary compatibility within the right most number of our versioning scheme, i.e. 1.0.x. Since version 1.1.0 is incrementing the middle number it is expected to have other changes which will break binary compatibility. Matt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
