On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:43, Michael Smith <m...@smithbowen.net> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen > <michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: >>> >> I have read the rumor. It is wrong. > > "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two > different things, right? My statement was referring to the "Introduced with intend".
I personally don't know anything about "known to the NSA". Best regards Michael > > I don't have any direct knowledge of what goes on in the > NSA, but if they don't have a whole cubicle farm full > of people looking for vulnerabilities, I'd be surprised. > OpenSSL would be an obvious high-value target for scrutiny > just because of its ubiquity. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
