At 12:59 9/23/2013 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
>
>I'll repeat myself - the fact that the
>/dev/random implementation you're using
>blocks is a serious design flaw.

Convince Linus, the GPG developers et al.--not me.

Till then I respect their view as embodied
by the latest implementation of random.c.

Perhaps this bleeding-edge analysis
will be accepted by the cryptographic
community and Linux will evolve as a
result.  I'm perfectly fine with that.

http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/338.pdf

But as it is a Free Country I'll experiment
with /dev/random and other sources of
randomness.  You seem a bit overworked
about it.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to