But... your results are the same as those of tls_prf_sha1_md5 which I took from the code of wpa_supplicant (sha1-tlsprf.c)
So which result is right? :) On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:04:20PM +0200, marek.marc...@malkom.pl wrote: > Hello, > > Output from attached code: > admin# ./mcl_tls1_PRF > 0x8b 0x13 0xc7 0x58 0xc3 0x4f 0x99 0x3a > 0x18 0x7d 0x29 0x45 0xed 0x5b 0x69 0x1d > > Best Regards, > -- > Marek Marcola <marek.marc...@malkom.pl> > > > > owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org wrote on 04/11/2013 09:48:51 PM: > > > Sergei Gerasenko <ser...@publicschoolworks.com> > > Sent by: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org > > > > 04/12/2013 11:57 AM > > > > Please respond to > > openssl-users@openssl.org > > > > To > > > > openssl-users@openssl.org, > > > > cc > > > > Subject > > > > RFC 2246 > > > > Hello, > > > > Does anybody have sample input and output for the tls1_PRF function > > which is described in RFC 2246? I've used several implementations of it > > including the one from openSSL and I'm not sure if what I'm getting is > right > > -- and all of them return something different. > > > > Thanks! > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
