quick update (sorry I was on a 3 days weekend)

the tar which was causing me this problem is the one on AIX 6.1 TL6 SP6
GNU tar 1.26 is working and being used as a workaround.



Yannick Bergeron
450 534-7711
yaber...@ca.ibm.com
Advisory IT Specialist



From:   Christopher Vance <cjsva...@gmail.com>
To:     openssl-users@openssl.org
Date:   2012-04-30 04:33
Subject:        Re: OpenSSL 1.0.1b released, invalid tar file!
Sent by:        owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org



In the past, I have had issues with tar files where the block size
wasn't specified, and the file was a multiple of 512 but not of 10240.
My solution was to pad out to a multiple of 10240.

On 30 April 2012 13:22, Dave Thompson <dthomp...@prinpay.com> wrote:
>> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of 
jb-open...@wisemo.com
>> Sent: Thursday, 26 April, 2012 19:37
>
>> On 26-04-2012 15:05, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
>> >  ... This archive under 7-Zip 9.20 (latest
>> >  stable) displays a "There are no trailing zero-filled records"
>> >  error dialog but then proceeds to work just fine.  ...
>
>> This is not limited to 7-Zip, see also the post by Mr. Bergeron
>> of IBM.
>>
> I didn't see that one, but a few more data points:
>
> Ancient Solaris (5.)8 says "tar: read error: unexpected EOF"
> but has in fact extracted or listed last file (VMS/WISHLIST.TXT)
> okay. Ancient AIX 4.3 goes into an apparently infinite loop on
> the last 8 files (!) but seems to have extracted/listed okay.
>
> Of the downloads I have at hand (about a year), the others
> with less than 2x512 zero at the end are 0.9.8q and 1.0.0-beta4 .
> 0.9.8q produces same symptoms but 1.0.0-beta4 does not. Blech.
>
> WinZip 12 is happy. As is gnu tar 1.13.19 1.14 1.15.1.
> I'm not startled by that; gnu programs in general usually
> tolerate slight nonstandardness, and often not-so-slight.
> This may be exchange for the nonstandardness they create.
>
>> I have looked closer at the tar.gz file (my download matches the
>> checksums and digital signature from Dr. Henson), and the file
>> is not valid according to the tar file format specifications that
>> I have looked at.
>>
>> According to the basic tar specification, each file is prefixed by
>> a 512 byte header with filename, size etc. and zero padded to a
>> multiple of 512 bytes, and the last file is followed by at least
>> 2x512 bytes of all-zero bytes to indicate end of file.  ...
>> But the tar file inside the gzip file "openssl-1.0.1b.tar.gz"
>> lacks those last 1024 bytes of zeroes.  ...

-- 
Christopher Vance
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org


Reply via email to