Thanks very much. That helps a little. it's also in the Makefile very clearly.
And why not use "1.0.1", like the "0.9.8" stream used? Thanks again. From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Farrell Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:01 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries have "1.0.0" in the names opensslv.h From: dave.mclel...@emc.com [mailto:dave.mclel...@emc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:43 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries have "1.0.0" in the names I'm seeing "1.0.0" used in the library (.so) names for crypto and ssl versions. I expected to see 1.0.1, consistent with the 0.9.X stream, where the version number agrees with version in the library name (as referenced in the link of the openssl executable for example). Can someone help me understand why it shouldn't "1.0.1" in the library reference names? I'm sorry if I've missed the mention of this in the CHANGES, README, etc. I have the official release kit, having moved on from beta3 kit. Thanks. +-+-+-+-+-+-+ Dave McLellan, Symmetrix Software Engineering EMC Corporation, 176 South St, Hopkinton MA Mail Stop 176-B1 1/P-36 office 508-249-1257, fax 508-497-8027 cell 978-500-2546 +-+-+-+-+-+-+
