Sorry... there was a typo:

Incorrect:
> Default build: darwin64-x86_64-cc (did not detect CERT_UNTRUSTED)
> Local build: darwin64-x86_64-llvm (detected CERT_UNTRUSTED correctly)

Correct:
Default build: darwin64-x86_64-llvm (did not detect
CERT_UNTRUSTED)Local build: darwin64-x86_64-cc (detected
CERT_UNTRUSTED correctly)

Thanks.


On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Yutaka Takeda <yt0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After some more investigation, the problem seems to happen only with
> OpenSSL (v0.9.8r) preinstalled with Mac OS X 10.6.8.
>
> If the test program is linked against *locally* built 0.9.8r,
> CERT_UNTRUSTED is correctly reported by SSL_get_verify_result().
>
> Log:
> OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011
> compiler: cc -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
> -fmessage-length=0 -pipe -Wno-trigraphs -fpascal-strings -fasm-blocks
> -O3 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -mmacosx-version-min=10.6
> -arch x86_64 -O3 -DL_ENDIAN -DMD32_REG_T=int -Wall
> built on: Wed Nov 16 13:53:59 PST 2011
> platform: darwin64-x86_64-cc
> OPENSSLDIR: "/usr/local/ssl"
> TCP connection successful
>>>>> verifyCallback() - in: preverify_ok=0
> Verify error: unable to get local issuer certificate(20)
>  - depth=1
>  - sub  ="/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority"
> <<<< verifyCallback() - out
> SSL handshake failed: SSL_ERROR_SSLFAIL
>
> Looking at the compile options, the only difference is the compiler
> openssl is built with:
>
> Default build: darwin64-x86_64-cc (did not detect CERT_UNTRUSTED)
> Local build: darwin64-x86_64-llvm (detected CERT_UNTRUSTED correctly)
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot build libssl/libcrypto with
> darwin64-x86_64-llvm and I cannot check if that makes any difference.
>
> Does anyone has any thoughts?
> - Yutaka
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to