Hi,

As far as I know, there is no point going again to the loop when we have
SSL_ERROR_SSL.
Suppose in case of SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ or SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE this would
have made sense.

Maybe there is a timeout or watchdog which stops it from consuming a lot of
time and closes the socket.

Since even I m not sure, lets wait for some experts comments.

BR,
Bharadwaj

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/SSL_ERROR_SSL-tp32496288p32503812.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to