Hi, As far as I know, there is no point going again to the loop when we have SSL_ERROR_SSL. Suppose in case of SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ or SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE this would have made sense.
Maybe there is a timeout or watchdog which stops it from consuming a lot of time and closes the socket. Since even I m not sure, lets wait for some experts comments. BR, Bharadwaj -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SSL_ERROR_SSL-tp32496288p32503812.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org