On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:12:11AM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 11/18/2010 10:36 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > > > > A 1.0.0c release is planned in the next few days. We're just seeing if any > > other issues arise before the release: a couple have been fixed already. > > Have any observed issues affected 0.9.8p? If so, is there a planned .8q?
None that are publically visible. You can check for yourself: http://cvs.openssl.org/timeline No commits to the 0.9.8 branch after the release of 0.9.8p. http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19996 The 1.0.0b issues are just the one reported in this thread: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20001 and a couple of platform variants where elimination of dead variables left non-working code referencing the eliminated variables. http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20008 http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20005 So far, it looks like the "20001" patch is sufficient for most platforms. -- Viktor. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org