On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:12:11AM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 11/18/2010 10:36 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > 
> > A 1.0.0c release is planned in the next few days. We're just seeing if any
> > other issues arise before the release: a couple have been fixed already.
> 
> Have any observed issues affected 0.9.8p?  If so, is there a planned .8q?

None that are publically visible. You can check for yourself:

    http://cvs.openssl.org/timeline

No commits to the 0.9.8 branch after the release of 0.9.8p.

    http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19996

The 1.0.0b issues are just the one reported in this thread:

    http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20001

and a couple of platform variants where elimination of dead variables
left non-working code referencing the eliminated variables.

    http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20008
    http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20005

So far, it looks like the "20001" patch is sufficient for most
platforms.

-- 
        Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to