On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:17:44AM -0800, Rene Hollan wrote:
>
> To someone who uses code, it doesn't matter a fig what the designer was
> thinking. It matter what the code does. Then you can decide if it does
> something correctly enough to be usable in the state it's in.
>
My sense is that this thread is no longer productive. Perhaps we can stop.
FWIW, the Postfix project strives to avoid documentation gaps, by not
accepting code contributions that are not *fully* documented at the time
the code is contributed. The first step towards improving OpenSSL docs,
would be to raise the bar for contributed code, and on-going development.
If code is not documented, it should not move from dev branches to the
trunk, and definitely not from the trunk to release branches.
Once on-going documentation stops being optional, one can start thinking
about past sins.
I don't want to add fuel to the fire, this is my final comment in this
thread. Sorry to prolong it any further...
--
Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
