On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:15:35AM -0700, Jason Pettiss wrote:
> We could take turns sending discrete pieces of each file but that's silly and
> slow.
>
> Assuming we can load these gigantic files into memory to make the example
> simpler, we could both do this to write:
It is possible to use non-blocking SSL_read() SSL_write() calls that
are interleaved, but not without a mutex or a separate thread that
owns all SSL I/O that consumes requests to read/write.
It is simpler to use two SSL connections. SSL is a state-machine, not a pipe.
--
Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
