On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:34:35 Rene Hollan wrote: > This is an April Fools' joke, right?
It's April 2, so I can reply now. Z80. Java. Casiotone. Doesn't the question sort of answer itself? Cheers, Geoff > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org on behalf of Geoff Thorpe > Sent: Wed 4/1/2009 12:11 PM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 1 released > > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 09:05:05 Thomas J. Hruska wrote: > > The problem is that I was under the distinct impression 0.9.9 was > > the next release and 1.0.0 was a pipe dream a few years down the > > road (at least). > > The choice of a 1.0 release is to clearly mark the fact that openssl > is shifting to a common base platform, namely Java. Platform > independence is going to make future development much easier, but > represents a significant enough change to warrant the new major > version. This decision has been driven by increasing demands to > support as-yet unsupported platforms; primarily Amiga, Z80, Casiotone, > and Windows. > > Regards, > Geoff -- Un terrien, c'est un singe avec des clefs de char... ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
