Hi Hans,

 

I was using 0.9.8c but I was having problems.  I looked at the current
snapshot versions and found a lot had been changed so I opted to going to
0.9.9 current in development version.

 

I also made a patch/change to verification of tokens to set the current time
for verification in the certificate store to the time the token was signed
as I was having an issue verifying tokens where the certificate was
currently expired (but was not expired at time of signing).

 

I use curl to make requests which is very simple to use.

 

Brad

 

  _____  

From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
hans.kra...@bit.admin.ch
Sent: Tuesday, 13 January 2009 7:16 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: time stamping authority support in openssl: ts, tsget: which
version to use best?

 

Dear all, 

I would like to use "ts" and "tsget" to test a  TSA (time stamping
authority) prototype. 

I looked at the download list of  <file:///\\www.opentsa.org>
www.opentsa.org and was a little confused. 

The latest openssl version supported is 0.9.8c, which is pretty outdated. 
I read that "ts" and "tsget" will be integrated in Openssl version 0.9.9.
The feature is already documented (
<file:///\\www.openssl.org\docs\apps\tsget.html>
www.openssl.org/docs/apps/tsget.html,
<file:///\\www.openssl.org\docs\apps\ts.html>
www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ts.html). But sofar the most recent
openssl-version, 0.9.8j, does not support ts and tsget.

Does anybody have any recommendation on which version to use to get
TSA-support in openssl? 

What platform to recommend? 

Best regards & thanks a lot in advance 

Hans 

PS: 
I have installed the 0.9.8c-Version on Ubuntu 8.10. But I got the following
error message: 
u...@ubuntu810desktop:~/hwkramer$ /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ts -query -data
test.txt -out test.tsq 
Illegal instruction 

  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1892 - Release Date: 1/13/2009
8:04 PM


Reply via email to