Terrible idea ?   Can I know why ?  If my private key stay private, why a
SHA256 on it can creates a security hole ?



Victor Duchovni wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:30:51AM -0800, BiGNoRm6969 wrote:
> 
>> I am doing a SHA256 on a RSA* private key. I used the result as a
>> symmetric
>> key for AES encryption.
> 
> This is a terrible idea. Use PKCS7, S/MIME or CMS. Don't invent your
> own security protocols or message formats.
> 
>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> int length = RSA_size(rsaPrivateKey);
>> 
> 
> The "rsaPrivateKey" hers is an in memory data structure with various
> pointers, ... it is not a fixed serialization of the key. For that you
> need to "i2dRSAPrivateKey", but that would be a mistake too, see above.
> 
> -- 
>       Viktor.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-SHA256-on-a-RSA*-key-tp21093222p21100929.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to