Sander, >>/opt/nfast/toolkits/openssl/openssl098e-patch.txt
Could you send/post the nCipher patch 0.9.8e - I am using one supplied originally by nCipher for 0.9.8a Although the patch I have works well with all 0.9.8x versions I would be keen to compare them just for my own curiosity. thanks, P.M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sander Temme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <openssl-users@openssl.org> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 6:09 PM Subject: Re: CRYPTO_set_dynlock_* mystery ... (was: Engine Issue: nShield 500) On Nov 21, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Max Pala wrote: > I definitely did - now I do initialize all the static locks in > OpenSSL *and* the > dynamic functions. But they are never called by the chil - the > assert fails and > the SIGABRT is sent to my daemon forcing it to exit. The library needs both the static locks and the dynamic locking upcalls. > Anybody knows where can I find the patched OpenSSL version from > nCipher ? /opt/nfast/toolkits/openssl/openssl098e-patch.txt Should apply cleanly to newer versions of OpenSSL, with patch -p1. It creates a static lock for CHIL to use so it doesn't need the dynamic ones available. I personally think the dynamic locking concept is more elegant, but I do agree it smells of duplicated code because everyone has to set up the same scaffolding. S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
