I am using the traffic obtained from s_server and s_client sample programs
and the keys that have been negotiated by both the programs to decrypt the
encrypted traffic between the two. That would mean that I am using TCP.
Also, I am running them under the CBC mode.

Vijay K.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Julian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's hard to approach this without knowing the mode of operation you are
> running CBC, OFB, CTR? Also are you using UDP with varying packet sizes?
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:25 PM, Vijay Kotari wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>> I am using EVP_DecryptUpdate() and EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() to decrypt a
>> SSL packet that I have captured. The cipher that I am using AES256 and
>> I can read the application data in cleartext as a result. The problem
>> comes if the application data size > 8, which I think has something to
>> do with me using a block cipher. I can't seem to decrypt the data
>> then. Anyways, after inspecting the packet dumps, I realized that
>> sometimes I get fragmented packets.
>> For Example,
>> 17 03 01 00 20 85 99 2a 94 4d 0e 56 2c 81 bc fc
>> 4d c9 32 aa 85 46 90 02 6d 4e b6 c6 da 4b d9 82
>> e9 ab cf 77 e7 17 03 01 00 20 76 68 51 17 9e 86
>> d4 20 6e 31 3e 7a 96 17 d5 cd c0 ba 5c cd ba 11
>> 2b 18 b1 8d d8 3c 15 3d e9 c7
>> This is actually two packets that are using the SSL application
>> protocol, each of size 0x20 (The second packet starts on line 3,  6th
>> byte onwards). While decrypting, should both these packets be merged
>> together and hence treated as a single packet of size 0x40 or should
>> packet be processed separately. Since, we are using a block cipher of
>> size 256 bits(32 bytes), will it even make a difference?
>>
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Vijay Kotari
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to