-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Victor Duchovni schrieb: | On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:15:03PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | |> So we're testing out an upgrade from OpenSSL 0.9.7e to 0.9.8g, |> and we're mostly using the SSL network connection functionality, |> not the crypto lib. |> |> I am supposed to help with a test plan to make sure our stuff works |> properly, but I'm not sure what to test. I imagine that it has to be |> backward compatible, since everyone using HTTPS has to be, but am not |> sure. |> |> Other than reading the NEWS page for changes, can anyone think of |> something I should do or something specific I should test? |> |> I wasn't that familiar with OpenSSL but I'm in charge of our crypto |> code now, so I have to become so quite quickly. :-) | | The two releases are binary and protocol compatible. You don't need to | recompile your applications, just deploy the new shared library and | header files (for building new applications). |
0.9.7e and 0.9.8g are binary compatible ? Who told you that ? All code build for 0.9.7* has to be recompiled for use with 0.9.8*. Besides certificate verification and session reconnect I don't know any details what you have to retest. Goetz - -- DMCA: The greed of the few outweights the freedom of the many -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH0Gln2iGqZUF3qPYRAutlAJ9CmsVIKB2ZcbaIdRHxtO9Vn1VHJACfdRMx olZ2PA/q1zompRUx5jAR20g= =G45N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
