On Dec 22, 2007, at 11:42 AM, David Schwartz wrote:
I don't think the license can compel you to make a demonstrably false statement. I think such a clause would be considered unconscionable. However, if the clauses are true under any reasonable interpretation at all, then it's probably not unconscionable to compel them. The would likely have to be unambiguously false, demonstrable clearly.
Assuming Roy Wood is the only author in this case, then it depends on whether or not he represents the OpenSSL Project.
Then OpenSSL license is incompatible with the GPL, and not just because of the advertising clauses.
I concede the point. I'll distribute any software containing OpenSSL code as a separate module under a compatible license.
Thanks everyone for your input. Josh ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
