Hello,
> If your users are not technically sophisticated, and the application is
> aimed at paying business customers and not the general public, it is
> enough to compile the key into the application. Businesses don't like
> being caught stealing.
> 
> If or users are the general public and/or they are strongly motivated
> to attack the application, then it is only a matter of time...
> 
> They can usually not only replace the public key, but also simply remove
> the code that performs the signature checks, ...
> 
> There are companies selling something called "white-box-cryptography".
> They have keyed self-obfuscating code, where it is difficult to analyze
> the control flow of the application, and the encryption is built in
> the structure of the binary rather than merely being data. Their target
> market is DRM.
> 
> Perhaps you are looking for something like that. Don't recall any specific
> names, but the term should get you started in the right direction. This
> is not an endorsement of the security of their products, I don't know
> enough to endorse or condemn them.
You may also look at "Secure Programming Cookbook for C and C++" chapter 12
with TOC:
Chapter 12. Anti-Tampering
12.1 Understanding the Problem of Software Protection
12.2 Detecting Modification
12.3 Obfuscating Code
12.4 Performing Bit and Byte Obfuscation
12.5 Performing Constant Transforms on Variables
12.6 Merging Scalar Variables
12.7 Splitting Variables
12.8 Disguising Boolean Values
12.9 Using Function Pointers
12.10 Restructuring Arrays
12.11 Hiding Strings
12.12 Detecting Debuggers
12.13 Detecting Unix Debuggers
12.14 Detecting Windows Debuggers
12.15 Detecting SoftICE
12.16 Countering Disassembly
12.17 Using Self-Modifying Code

but of course this is no real security but this only makes hard software
hackers job.

Best regards,
-- 
Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to