Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:08:06PM -0400, Jim Marshall wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:48:42PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
/* This is just one of the tests I have tried */
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &rfds);
FD_ZERO(&wfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &wfds);
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(acceptSock, &efds);
do {
/* see if we have any activity on the socket */
waitVal = select(acceptSock, &rfds, &wfds, &efds, &tv);
What happens when you pass 'select' fd sets that make sense and set the
first parameter appropriately?
i.e. (acceptSock + 1) not (acceptSock).
Pardon my ignorance, but why do you need to specify acceptSock+1? I
tried this and it fixed the problem, but I don't understand why.
This is described in the select() manpage.
So it is:
"nfds is the highest-numbered file descriptor in any of the three sets,
plus 1"
When I read this I didn't realize I had to add one to the socket, I
thought the select call would deal with that :O. Thanks for the insight,
I really appreciate your help!
-Jim
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
