Hi,

Thanks for your input. AFAIK registering these callbacks will result
in locking the SSL datastructures internally by the OpenSSL whenever
required. My question is since I've handled these in my application is
it necessay for me to register these callbacks once again to the
OpenSSL. I'm handling this in application becoz i've to save some more
datas in the application scope from multiple thread access. So I've
taken a lock and using the same lock I'm trying protect the SSL
datastructures also.
So I this case is it necessary to register once again into the openSSL.

regards,
S.Kingston Smiler.

On 9/5/07, zhuxian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you needn't lock the SSL_connect/SSL_accept. It's too low efficient.
>
>
> You just have to set the lock callback using:
>
>     CRYPTO_set_locking_callback(pthread_lock_handler);
>
>     CRYPTO_set_id_callback(id_handler);
>
> It works fine in linux. But it does not in WinXP.  I was  puzzled with it
> too.
>
> Regards,
> Kurt.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kingston Smiler
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 3:53 PM
> >To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> >Subject: Reagrding Thread safety in OpenSSL
> >
> >Hi,
> >   I'm having a small query regarding the thread safety of the
> >OpenSSL library.
> > OpenSSL provide some set of Static Locking Callbacks and
> >Dynamic locking callbacks to ensure the thread safety of the
> >OpenSSL data structures. But if the application using the
> >OpenSSL, implements its own locking mechanism while accessing
> >the SSL calls (SSL_Connect,SSL_Read e.t.c) then is it
> >necessary to implment those callbacks also?
> >
> > i.e
> >
> >code like this
> >
> >Thread1
> >{
> >
> >lock (a)
> >SSL_Connect(pSSL)
> >unlock(a)
> >
> >}
> >
> >Thread2
> >{
> >lock (a);
> >SSL_accept(pSSL);
> >unlok(a);
> >}
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> >User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> >Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to