Cool. I figured you guys are mostly testing with nasm so that's what I'm using. But I was just curious if anybody has done any benchmark tests to see whether one assembler generated more efficient assembly than the other that would result in noticeably better performance.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-openssl- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:22 AM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: nasm vs. masm > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Edward Chan wrote: > > > Anybody have any idea which assembler is preferred when building with > > VC8? > > > > Currently you can use either but in future nasm will be the only supported > assembler. This is the case with 0.9.9-dev. > > Steve. > -- > Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage > OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant. > Funding needed! Details on homepage. > Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
