On 10/23/06, Rodney Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
try libtomcrypt ;-)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Minimal configuration
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:58:15 -0700
From: Grant Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
First, sorry for posting to -users and -dev. I'm not sure which is
more appropriate.
I'm working on an embedded system with no operating system and am only
interested in signature verification. I've looked at the config and
have decided to go with "no-threads no-zlib no-shared". But I'm
having trouble deciding which "cpu/compiler" config to go with. I am
using gcc and mips (not mipsel).
I'm not worried about resources (have plenty of RAM). I'm only
interested in verifying signatures. So some extra switches that strip
out functions that handle encryption or signing would also be great.
I am looking for the smallest libcrypt possible.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Grant Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rodney,
Thanks. However, I did forget to mention that I need to support
the PKCS #7 message structure. But I'll keep libtomcrypt in mind for
other projects.
--
Grant Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
