--- Florian G otter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello everybody !
> 
> I have a problem witht the SSL_accept / handshake
> which i could not
> resolve with the help of the net / colleagues /
> time.
> 
> Having written a small server / client, it gives the
> following output
> (debug info generated by me with the help of
> SSL_get_error ):
> 
> SSL PrivateKey opened successfully
> Rate set to 100000
> Waiting for client...
> Waiting for client...
> SSL Handshake (SSL_accept) failed - error code 0
> SSL_ERROR_SSLErr during Handshake from SSL error
> queue:
> error:140C5042:SSL
> routines:SSL_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION:called a function
> you
> 
> should not call
> SSL_ERROR_SSLErr from SSL error queue:
> error:140C5042:SSL
> routines:SSL_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION:called a function
> you should not call
> 
> Does anybody know what could be the cause of the
> error:140C5042:SSL
> routines:SSL_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION:called a function
> you
> should not call respectively the SSL Handshake error
> ?
> The certificate as well as the private key seem to
> load fine - does this
> mean that they are correct ? - Is there a problem
> with the certificate /
> key ? - Could the problem be somewhere else ?
> 
> Many thanks

If you could be kind enough to post the client and
server source code, I could gladly debug it for you.
:-)

regards,
Girish
> 
> Florian G otter
> 
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                
> http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                   
> openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                          
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to