--- Urjit Gokhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Thanks for the reply.> > Urjit,
> > >
> > > I got it working once I replaced
> > > "EXP-DES-CBC-SHA" with
> > > "DES-CBC-SHA"
> > >
> > > I think you might have to do something special
> to
> > > enable export quality ciphers.
> > >
> >
> > They can place restrictions on the size of the RSA
> key used for kex
> exchange.
> > That means that if the key in the certificate is
> larger than the limit a
> > temporary RSA key is used instead. You need to
> supply that.
> >
> Well ... In that case,
> A] how is it that s_server and s_client can
> communicate
> 1) Using the same ssl library
> 2) Using the same certificates
> 3) Using the same cipher suits

You mean can't , don't u? That is bcoz SSL protocol
itself is different in the export case. As Steve
mentioned there is an additional key exchange stage,
kex in the case of export ciphers.


> 
> B] How is it that my sample_client connects to
> s_server using
> "EXP-DES-CBC-SHA" ? Does this mean that ristrictions
> are applied only at the
> server side? Or is it just that the server is the
> first one to process the
> certificate and fails to do so due to different RSA
> key size, and s_server
> somehow manages to handle exportable cipher suite
> and the presented
> certificate (?) ?

In fact I commented out ur client cert stuff. Server
is king in SSL. :-) Client hardly matters. 
> 
> Another question is:
> Is it only the key size restrictions or something
> else as well, that is
> different between EXP-DES-CBC... and DES-CBC... ?
> Also, what are the general scenarios when one would
> prefer an exportable
> cipher suite over non-exportable cipher suits?

Other than key strength there would be no other
consideration IMHO. 

> 
> > Steve.
> 
> ~ Urjit
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential
> information which is the property of Persistent
> Systems Pvt. Ltd. It is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
> authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute
> or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and
> delete all copies of this message. Persistent
> Systems Pvt. Ltd. does not accept any liability for
> virus infected mails.
>
______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                
> http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                   
> openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                          
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to