Hello, > In particular, having a separate certificate for each of the > servers (desktop systems) really could be problematic considering > the number of them, although having one for each client (print > servers) could be feasible. If you control all this - this may be acceptable.
> Someone suggested to me that I use stunnel on both sides. Could > this be the solution ? Yes. > Since I entirely control the code on both the client and server > sides, is there a simpler solution that could be implemented ? If you control your code better solution might be writing your own SSL layer in application. But this will be more complicated then using stunnel, but you will have better control on any SSL aspects and better integration with your application. Best regards, -- Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
