On 5/15/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With 2000 simultaneous connections, your limit would be the kernel, not the encryption. :)
well, with modern *nix kernels this is not a big problem anymore, but we also don't target that many simultaneous connections either right now, so...
-Kyle H On 5/14/06, Joseph Oreste Bruni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I put together a multi-way messaging system supporting over 2000 > simultaneous persistent connections. During my initial design, I was > concerned that the encryption would become an issue, especially with > that many connections. So, we purchased some pretty burly hardware to > support the application ( Dual 2.0 GHz Xserve G5 ). It turns out that > the encryption has almost no impact on performance and that machine > spends most of its time at 95% idle. > > :) > > > On May 14, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote: > > > Most of the time > > you'll find the bottlenecks aren't in the SSL/TLS layer at all. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
