> That'd do it. But if you're doing the loop in that sequence, and
> if you have
> set non-blocking on the sockets, then instead of polling for the
> connection
> you can use select or poll (depending on your platform) to wait
> for incoming
> connection activity, then enter ssl_accept in blocking mode which would
> probably cut down on those fake errors. Wouldn't this be a better
> sequence?
Eww, no. Suppose the connection is aborted before you manage to call
SSL_accept. The call could block indefinitely. It is almost always a mistake
to use 'select' or 'poll' with blocking socket operations.
DS
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]