Vadim Fedukovich wrote:
a hotmail account might be considered a handy tool but it hardly could be
regarded as anonymous.

Please take a look at mixmaster.sf.net (the tool)
and network of remailers running around. There was mixmaster protocol
ietf draft published recently

That was the "or whatever". ;) You can be as thorough as you like, but registering a random hotmail account and perhaps sending mail from a public place is frequently good enough. (I personally don't see the need for perfect anonymity when posting questions about an API, even a security-related one.)


I don't see why using an anonymous remailer for greater protection would be any different - IIRC they support creating a consistent pseudonym and sending and receiving many mails to/from it.

It is not quite clear whether there's a chance to both accept mail from
remailers and kill the junk

I think just simply requiring people to be list members before posting would be enough to make a big impact.


This would completely stop the "you sent us a virus" messages that Robin Lynn Frank mentioned. Anti-virus software is not going to subscribe to the mailing list first; if its makers had realized these messages would be sent to mailing lists, they wouldn't be sending them at all.

And while spammers _could_ subscribe to mailing lists before sending a bunch of spam, they typically don't, based on my experiences with other lists.


regards, Vadim

Thanks, Scott

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to