On Tue, Jan 06, 2004, Frédéric Giudicelli wrote: > > Now that we have dynamic locks it would be possible to do things properly > but > > it hasn't been done yet. > Has it been implemented for usual structs yet ? Because 0.9.7c it still uses > those "ugly" global locks. >
Not yet no. It isn't too hard to do for the reference counting stuff where it could use the global locks as a fallback and store dynamic locks in structures. It would be at least 0.9.8 when this done. Its too big a change for the bug fix 0.9.7X releases. > > That's been *reported* to work but I haven't tried it myself. > Well, I honestly see no reasons why it wouldn't work, the SSL structure > would be protected at a higher level that's all. Unless you have some thread > associated datas in the SSL structures? (which I don't recall) > I don't see any reason either but I can't rule out some obscure condition that will mess it up. So I'm being cautious here in case it blows up and I get the blame :-) Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant. Funding needed! Details on homepage. Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
