In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:58:39 +0200, Stefan Olsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
stefan> >/* This testing gunk is implemented (and explained) lower down. It also
assumes
stefan> > * the application explicitly calls "ENGINE_load_openssl()" because this is no
stefan> > * longer automatic in ENGINE_load_builtin_engines(). */
stefan> >
stefan> >See the part that says the application explicitely has to call
stefan> >ENGINE_load_openssl() to get that engine loaded at all? are you doing
stefan> >something like that in your application? If so, don't.
stefan> >
stefan> Oki. If I don't place that call (or more specific does not specify any
stefan> engine at all) it works just fine, but our application needs Atalla
stefan> support for performance and if I don't make a ENGINE_load_openssl();
stefan> call before ENGINE_by_id this call failes. What am I missing here?
Either ENGINE_load_builtin_engines() (if you want to maximise the
potential of using any supported hardward that happens to be
available) or ENGINE_load_atalla(). And what exactly is the identity
you give ENGINE_by_id()?
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsv�gen 3 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
