I need to implement openssl into an embedded system, and I have read that RC5 uses only primitive computational operations commonly found on microprocessors. My other option was Blowfish, 'cause it can run in few kb of memory (around 5K)
Could you suggested me anything? Thanks Ana uoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > anyway remember that rc5 64 bit was hacked so at least use rc5 72 bit. > why you really want to use rc5 ? > you can use other better chipers > > ciao > > Rick > > On Fri, 30 May 2003, Brian Hatch wrote: > > > > > > > > RC5 does not appeared on the list, what can I do now? > > > > As explained earlier in the thread, if you want to use it, > > it needs to be compiled in. Recompile and reinstall OpenSSL. > > You can turn on/off ciphers (such as using --no-idea at configure > > time) so make sure you include the ciphers you require. I'd > > suggest using >=0.9.7 which includes AES, just in case you need > > it down the road. > > > > Or you could pick different ciphers to use and give up on RC5. > > > > -- > > Brian Hatch It's a small world, > > Systems and but I wouldn't want > > Security Engineer to back it up. > > http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ > > > > Every message PGP signed > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
