On 03 Feb 2003 19:01:53 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>Tim Regovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>*always* operate in non blocking mode. The code may
>>be slightly more complex but will *always* work
>>better.
>I don't agree with this. Getting non-blocking code correct
>with OpenSSL is quite tricky. If you don't need non-blocking,
>there's no reason to do it.
You nearly always need non-blocking, even if it's just for timeouts.
DS
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
