The pkcs7_verify works in the first verification but I
dont know how to use that  bio as an entry to the second
pkcs7_verify (in the first parameter p7), to check the
validity of the first signed pkcs7. Have you any idea?
I haven't  found the function to do that.

Thanks

> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:16:12PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've realised a signed pkcs7 with "pkcs7_sign", then
I
> > repeat the same function but the content is the first
> > signed pkcs7, so I get a signed pkcs7 into a signed
> > pkcs7. All works fine, but when I try to verify it, I
> > faced a problem with the second verification (the
first
> > pkcs7_verify works and I've got a successfull
> > operation).
> > I dont know how to extract the content of the second
> > signed pkcs7 to verify it and still  dont find a
> > function doing that.
>
> pkcs7_verify() does that.
> if the 5th parameter is not NULL but a bio,
> the content written there.
>
>
> Regards
> Christian
>
>
> > Anyone faced the same problem? Or tried to do
hierarchic
> > signature?
> >
> > Thanks for replies.
> >
> > -------------------
> > L'e-mail gratuit pas comme les autres.
> > NOMADE.FR, pourquoi chercher ailleurs ?
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________________________________
____________
> > OpenSSL Project
http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List                    openssl-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________________________________
____________
> OpenSSL Project
http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-------------------
L'e-mail gratuit pas comme les autres.
NOMADE.FR, pourquoi chercher ailleurs ?


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to