At 03:11 09.12.2002 +0100, you wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:00:47 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >mlh> Haven't got that yet .. was it on the announce or users list? > >Both. Oh well, the announcements seem to have a certain latency to >them, possibly because the copy to openssl-announce is moderated. >I've no idea why that would stop mail to the other addresses...
Is the patch really correct? Index: crypto/opensslv.h =================================================================== RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/opensslv.h,v retrieving revision 1.36.2.25 retrieving revision 1.36.2.26 diff -u -u -r1.36.2.25 -r1.36.2.26 --- crypto/opensslv.h 2002/12/05 22:44:12 1.36.2.25 +++ crypto/opensslv.h 2002/12/05 22:53:20 1.36.2.26 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for * major minor fix final patch/beta) */ -#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x0090608fL ^ ^ -#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT "OpenSSL 0.9.6h 5 Dec 2002" +#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00906090L +#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT "OpenSSL 0.9.6i-dev xx XXX xxxx" ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ #define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT Or did i get the wrong patch file? Ciao, Richard (a little bit confused) -- Dr. Richard W. Könning Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH, EP LP COM 5 Phone/Fax: +49-89-636-47852 / 47655 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
