On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:17:58PM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote: > I'm having a few delicate problems, and I think at least one of them > adheres to non-blocking sockets, which is what I use. > > 1) Is it possible to get a WANT_WRITE error when I actually don't have > anything to send (on my high-level layer)? [...]
Yes. See the SSL_get_error() manpage, http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/SSL_get_error.html > 2) Say I have a program that sends a tiny crucial piece of data to another > program and can't do anything before it gets another tiny crucial piece of > data back... Can this go wrong in the sense that the first (or second for > that matter) piece of data isn't large enough to fill an SSL record, so > that it won't get sent and everything locks down? [...] No. Records can be tiny, the application does not have to worry about this. -- Bodo Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html * TU Darmstadt, Theoretische Informatik, Alexanderstr. 10, D-64283 Darmstadt * Tel. +49-6151-16-6628, Fax +49-6151-16-6036 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
