Using the nothrow form of new maybe an idea.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 January 2002 14:51
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CRYPTO_malloc_init()
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robert)
>
> robert> Will CRYPTO_mallic_init() set the memory allocation methods if
> robert> i use C++ new() & delete()?
>
> You mean you awnt to do something like this?
>
> CRYPTO_malloc_init(&new, NULL, &delete);
>
> That won't work. new and delete are not functions, they are
> statements. However, it should be perfectly possible to wrap them in
> functions of your own, and use those functions. Beware of exceptions.
>
> --
> Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
> Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
