Nice observations. The alpha is gone now? When did DEC
discontinue it? Lastly in the measurement what does
"um" stand for? Thanks
--- Bryan-TheBS-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diarmuid Oneill wrote:
> > When I download and build OpenSSL (which works
> fine!) and run the
> > openssl speed rsa1024 tests, I get around 68 rsa
> signings/sec. When I
> > run this on a 4 CPU (700Mhz) P3 machine I get
> around 103 private rsa
> > signings/sec. I understand that the test is
> running on 1 cpu only but
> > that's the case for both machines.
>
> It looks like most of the functions are integer.
> Itanium is slower, MHz
> for MHz, than just about any x86 Pro+ processor at
> integer (even using
> optimized code). Only at floating point does
> Itanium do about 2x a P3,
> MHz for MHz (and the P4 is slower than the P3, MHz
> for MHz, unless you
> use "lossy"/interpolated SSE instructions).
>
> -- TheBS
>
> P.S. It's sad to see a 3-year old design at 0.35um,
> the Alpha 264
> 667MHz/4MB, can toast the 0.13um Itanium 733MHz/4MB
> at floating point.
> Too bad Alpha is gone now.
>
> --
> Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> chat:thebs413
> Engineer AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc.
> http://www.linux-wlan.org
> President SmithConcepts, Inc.
> http://www.SmithConcepts.com
>
______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project
> http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
