From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (robert) robert> Just a thought. Why do u release version's of openssl that u robert> suspect will not compile for win32 nt4. why not try to robert> compile at lease once before you release. some of us are robert> trying to get from point a to point b without visitaions from robert> the Valkyrie. if u don't want to support win32 nt why not robert> just say so. give it up to some other mini monopoly and lets robert> them compete and see who gets to the Valhalla first. You seem to be confused. In the text, you're talking about a release (without saying which one) while in the subject line, you're talking about a specific snapshot. The releases we do are usually tested during a release cycle of at least two weeks, usually by volunteers out there. The platforms tested on are as many different Unixen as we can get hold on (or managed by people we can get hold on), OpenVMS (often, but not always, tested by me) and Windows in many configurations (I've done some tests on Win2000 using both CygWin and VC++ for the last release (0.9.6a)). Snapshots are, however, a completely different thing. They are exactly what the name says, a snapshot of whatever development has been done during the day. There is *NO* guarantee that tests have been done on your favorite platform, only on the platforms that the one working on OpenSSL happened to work on. For me, that's most often Linux or OpenVMS. BTW, since OpenSSL is a volunteer project, the best you can do is simply help us by testing and telling us in great detail what goes wrong, and in the best case, you might even join in a patch that fixes the problem. I don't know about you, but to me that feels like energy spent much better than on whining :-). -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: win c_print.c hosed on lastest snapshot 04/13/01 * long longproblem
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Sat, 14 Apr 2001 00:17:43 -0700
- Re: win c_print.c hosed on lastest snapshot ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: win c_print.c hosed on lastest snap... Sandipan Gangopadhyay
- Re: win c_print.c hosed on lastest snap... robert