On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:45:24AM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> We are using openssl 0.9.6 on HP-UX 10.20.
> The two compilers that can be used is cc and gcc.
> I would like to use aCC (01.27) with the new standard c++ library (with
> switches -AA -D_RWSTD_MULTI_THREAD)
> I have succeded in building everything with gcc, but the libraries
> wouldn't be compatible with our other libraries.
> Code compiled without -AA is incompatible with code compiled with -AA.
> 
> Is there a solution for this? Have you built openssl with aCC?

Ok, let's see:
ws01 84: uname -a
HP-UX ws01 B.10.20 A 9000/780 2016288732 two-user license
ws01 85: what /opt/aCC/bin/aCC
/opt/aCC/bin/aCC:
        HP aC++ B3910B A.01.23
        HP aC++ B3910B A.01.19.02 Language Support Library
My manual page does not state anything about a -AA switch, only -Aa
is being listed.
Having this said: it accepts a -AA switch without a word and produces:
        aCC -I. -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DL -D_REENTRANT -O 
+DAportable -AA -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -DMD32_XARRAY -c mem_dbg.c
Error 212: "mem_dbg.c", line 321 # Argument type 'unsigned long
    (app_mem_info_st *)' does not match expected parameter type 'unsigned long
    (*)()'.
                            if ((amih=lh_new(app_info_hash,app_info_cmp)) == NU
[More error messages to come.]
I would say, it would probably take some time massaging everything to be
acceptable for aCC (if doable at all). The same errors occur with the
documented -Aa switch.

Sorry, no better news,
        Lutz
-- 
Lutz Jaenicke                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus               http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik                  Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus              Fax. +49 355 69-4153
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to