I would like to regard "SSL in kernel" as accessing SSL functions
through normal socket API. such as the SSL that Microsoft
offered in winsock2.
Seetharama Sarma Ayyadevara wrote:
> hi
>
> There are crypto accelrator cards that can do crypto on them, freeing the
> CPU. This requires copying of date to/from user space. To avoid this and to
> improve speed I thought openssl inside the kernel will help. That is why I
> posted the question.
>
> sarma
>
> Pascal Gienger wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 01:01:28PM -0800, Seetharama Sarma Ayyadevara wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Any one ported openssl or ssleay into linux kernel. Are there any
> > > projects going on to port ssl into kernel.
> >
> > Why you would do that? What's the purpose of having crypto and ssl routines
> > in the kernel? Do you really need SSL routines as syscalls or for kernel
> > routines?
> >
> > Pascal
> > --
> > Unix, Pascal Gienger, Steinstr. 21 /\ 12 .rtsnietS ,regneiG lacsaP xinU
> > Networx 78467 Konstanz / \ znatsnoK 76487 xrowteN
> > & WWW [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ed.niweulb@essenif WWW &
> > T: +49 7531 52709, F: 52739 / \ 93725 :F ,90725 1357 94+ :T
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
