> (a=b) && (a=BN_dup(b)); Oh gak, are we really trying to be clever for its own sake? >But back to the original question. I think it's really >Bug and should be handled by BN_dup() internally. I dunno. I prefer that functions coredump when given NULL pointers. /r$ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: BN_dup bug? Holger Reif
- Re: BN_dup bug? Ben Laurie
- Re: BN_dup bug? Mark Borgerding
- Re: BN_dup bug? Ben Laurie
- Re: BN_dup bug? Salz, Rich
- Re: BN_dup bug? Ben Laurie
- Re: BN_dup bug? Patrick G. Moore
- Re: BN_dup bug? carson