Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> 3moeller> Then direct VMS users to an appropriate snapshot in the
> 3moeller> announcements, because the latest VMS changes are also not
> 3moeller> in the tar file.
>
> Drat. OK, I'll build my own tarball and will direct the VMS folks to
> it (not that it's terribly important, except for the missing command
> symbols in VMS/openssl_utils.com, but that will get rid of most
> annoying bug reports about that :-)).
>
> Teaches me not to assume a patch sent in ~8 hours before the time it
> was announced that the tar ball would be built (someone asid 20:00)
> will get into said tarball...
Well, we already have a BN problem - lets leave it a day or two and roll
0.9.3a (sigh).
If people could stick to bugfix-only mode 'til, say, tomorrow, that'll
make life easier (or shall I just branch now and be done with it?).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
