Paul Rubin wrote:
> I had trouble with the SHA routine from ssleay on a Sparc
> and ended up replacing it with another version a while back.
> It didn't crash but it returned incorrect values.
> So maybe that implementation is buggy. I didn't have time
> to figure out what was wrong, back then.
Perhaps you were using SHA*() instead of SHA1*()? The former
uses the original specification of SHA before NSA put in their
fix. I'm using the SHA1 functions from SSLeay with good success
in a PGP-compatible DSA signature checker on both Linux and Sol/x86.
They share sha.h definitions including SHA_CTX, but from there
they're different.
Jim Gillogly
1 Thrimidge S.R. 1999, 22:27
12.19.6.2.6, 2 Cimi 14 Pop, First Lord of Night
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
